FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Tuesday, September 5, 2006
Jeffco League of Women Voters Shows Partisanship, Says Chandler
(Arvada) - "It is a very clear case where the League of Women Voters says one thing, but does another," said Dave Chandler, Colorado Green Party candidate for the U.S. House for the 7th Congressional District.
Chandler, and the American Constitution Party candidate for the same office, have both been excluded from a candidate forum sponsored by the Jefferson County League of Women Voters scheduled for Thursday evening, September 14, 2006, at the Denver Marriott West hotel.
"The national League's web site plainly states that they are "strictly non-partisan." However, by not including all the candidates, the Jeffco group is contradicting their own policy -- they are, in fact, being exclusively bi-partisan, favoring two particular parties over other legally recognized parties. That is not 'non-partisan'," Chandler said.
Chandler said that the League, as an organization to promote voter participation in the electoral process, sets a laudable standard "to make democracy work for all citizens."
"So, it is particularly disappointing and disheartening to see them adopt forum participation criteria that appear to be aimed at purposefully discriminating against candidates with new ideas and who, as a matter of principle, don't go along with the current corrupt campaign finance system," said Chandler.
The Jeffco League is requiring for participation in the forum that a candidate show "a significant level of financial support. Chandler will only accept campaign contributions of $500 or less from individuals.
"It is just sad to see the League succumbing to the same kind of narrow-minded, business-as-usual behavior that has led to the special-interest-driven, multi-million dollar, negative politics we too often see today," said Chandler.
<< Text of correspondence between Chandler and LWV follows. >>
CONTACT:
Dave Chandler
www.DaveChandler.us
Candidate
U.S. House of Representatives
7th Congressional District
Green Party of Colorado
[email protected]
303-424-9897
Arvada, CO
September 5th, 2006
Dear Mr. Chandler;
In quoting from our LWVUS Democracy Agenda, you rightfully noted that the League of Women Voters is in fact a strong advocate for campaign finance and lobbying reform. In that vein, we speak out to our representatives in government and work toward reform through legislation. We act to change the current policies and laws through our elected officials.
In the matter of candidate forums, our policy as stated in the previous email is two-fold. One, the candidate must show evidence of a significant level of financial support and secondly, exhibit substantive voter interest (10% or higher) in a nonpartisan poll. Both the LWV/Colorado and LWV/Jeffco boards reviewed and set these criteria at the beginning of the campaign season.
The Survey USA poll conducted exclusively for KUSA-TV Denver on August 18-20, 2006 showed your candidacy polling 2% of the results. In that light, the League made the decision to withhold an invitation to the event on September 14th.
Sincerely,
Cath Perrone, Voter Service Chair
Adrienne Andrews-Glenn, President
Jeffco League of Women Voters
August 31, 2006
Cath Perrone
Voter Service Chair
LWV of Jeffco
Dear Ms. Perrone:
I was very disappointed to receive your email communication informing me that I would not be invited to participate in the 7th Congressional Candidate Forum which the League of Women Voters of Jefferson County is sponsoring on Thursday, September 14, 2006.
I would sincerely ask you to reconsider.
I ask you to reevaluate based on values of the League of Women Voters, itself.
About itself, on its national web site, it is written:
About the League
... The League of Women Voters is strictly nonpartisan; it neither supports nor opposes candidates for office at any level of government.
... The organization remains true to its basic purpose: to make democracy work for all citizens.
<< http://www.lwv.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=About_Us >>
By shutting-out third party candidates, the League is not being non-partisan, it is, in fact, being exclusively bi-partisan, it is favoring two particular parties over other legally recognized parties. If the aim of the organization is “to make democracy work for all citizens,” then it is contradictory to deny a voice to certain citizens because of their political preference.
Furthermore, the criterion of requiring a candidate to have a “significant level of financial support” in order to participate directly contradicts the sentiments expressed by the national League of Women Voters president:
"The fourth and final item on our Democracy Agenda concerns the role of money and special interests in American politics. We know that “he who pays the piper calls the tune.” That’s why campaign finance and lobbying reform are so important to protecting our democracy. When special interests are the dominant source of campaign funding, when special interests have special access to Congress, indeed when special interest lobbyists can call the tune on Capitol Hill, then it is time for fundamental reform.
"Citizens are deeply concerned about the growing issues of corruption and ethics abuses in politics. Americans do not want to give wealth and special interests more access to power. American citizens, in fact, want more reform, not a retreat from anti-corruption safeguards."
AMERICAN DEMOCRACY AT RISK: AGENDA FOR RENEWAL AND REPAIR
LWVUS President Kay J. Maxwell
Santa Fe, New Mexico
January 31, 2006
<< http://www.lwv.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Campaign_Finance_Reform&TEMPLATE=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&CONTENTID=4323 >>
An essential principle of my candidacy is a rejection of the practice that has created the present day political environment where “special interests are the dominant source of campaign funding.” Moreover, I agree that “Americans do not want to give wealth and special interests more access to power.”
Since I have taken a principled position not to participate in the system of “he who pays the piper calls the tune,” I simply will not have a “significant level of financial support.” Indeed, it is now being estimated that in the 7th CD race, the two major party candidates will raise and spend from $10 to $12 million on their campaigns! This would appear to be a prime example of why LWVUS President Kay J. Maxwell says it is “time for fundamental reform.” It seems, therefore, incongruous with the stated League stand on campaign finance reform to exclude me from your forum.
In the interests of making democracy work for all citizens, and in the interests of campaign finance reform, I ask you to please include all legally qualified candidates for the U.S. House of Representative for the 7th CD in your September 14 forum.
Sincerely,
Dave
Dave Chandler
Candidate - Green Party of Colorado
U.S. House of Representatives
7th Congressional District
[email protected]
303-424-9897
cc: Adrienne Andrews-Glenn, President, LWV of Jeffco
Flodie Anderson, President, LWV of Colorado
Board, LWV of Colorado
August 28, 2006
Dave Chandler
Green Party Candidate
7Th Congressional District
Dear Mr. Chandler;
The League of Women Voters of Jefferson County has chosen NOT to invite you to participate in the 7th Congressional Candidate Forum it is sponsoring on Thursday, Sept. 14th.
As the Voter Service Chair for the Jeffco League, I wanted to inform you of our decision directly and answer any questions you may have in regard to it. Our criteria is posted below for your review. Please don't hesitate to contact me.
Both the LWV of Colorado and Jeffco Boards reviewed and set this criteria at the beginning of the campaign season. The evidence of a substantive voter interest in a candidate indicated by nonpartisan polls (10% or higher) and a significant level of financial support must appear in order for a candidate to be invited to a League sole-sponsored event.
Please be aware, if you choose to attend this event, you will not be allowed to speak to the audience or answer any questions.
Sincerely,
Cath Perrone
Voter Service Chair
LWV of Jeffco
CC:
Adrienne Andrews-Glenn, President, LWV of Jeffco